宝塔面板CPU性能分数和Unixbench分数对比
UnixbenchUnixbench分数Unixbench跑分宝塔跑分
宝塔面板CPU性能分数和Unixbench分数对比
宝塔面板自带的性能跑分挺方便的，但是市面上VPS评测大部分都是跑的Unixbench分数。
下面我用台1核的VPS分别测试了宝塔和Unixbench跑分作为对比。仅供参考
提示：
Unixbench跑分时间较长。
程序版本：
宝塔跑分版本1.3
Unixbench版本5.1.3
这台VPS，是以前跟一个商家要的测试机，10月26日开机测试宝塔CPU分数为987分。
今天11月13日作为对比，我又给他跑了一次分数，这次是1000分整。波动不大，可见还是可以作为参考的。
下面是Unixbench的跑分。Unixbench分数为512！大概是宝塔跑分的一半！
跑分脚本：
wget --no-check-certificate https://github.com/teddysun/across/raw/master/unixbench.sh && chmod +x unixbench.sh && ./unixbench.sh
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/unixbench/UnixBench'sh: 3dinfo: command not found # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Execl Throughput 1 2 31 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 31 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 31 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Process Creation 1 2 31 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 31 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: uJ4eesNTMi: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Thu Nov 8 23:39:32 UTC 2018 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz (4800.0 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 11:20:26 up 17 days, 18:48, 1 user, load average: 1.42, 4.82, 2.62; runlevel 3------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Fri Nov 13 2020 11:20:26 - 11:50:171 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 17120260.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 3796.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1613.8 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 281898.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 75636.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 782155.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 391313.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 84299.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 5313.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2342.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 317.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 361626.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17120260.0 1467.0Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3796.7 690.3Execl Throughput 43.0 1613.8 375.3File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 281898.2 711.9File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 75636.0 457.0File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 782155.4 1348.5Pipe Throughput 12440.0 391313.8 314.6Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 84299.7 210.7Process Creation 126.0 5313.9 421.7Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2342.2 552.4Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 317.0 528.4System Call Overhead 15000.0 361626.8 241.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 512.5======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
下载仅供下载体验和测试学习，不得商用和正当使用。
